Neither a review nor refiling is absolutely superior; the core criteria are: the extent of investment in using the trademark, the arguability of the refusal grounds, and your tolerance for time cost. The two can also run in parallel on a dual track.
When to Choose a Review
- The trademark is already in use — packaging, promotion, and channels are all rolled out — and rebranding would be costly;
- The refusal grounds have substantive room for argument (e.g., moderate similarity, a cited trademark vulnerable to non-use cancellation, or use evidence supporting distinctiveness);
- You want to preserve the original filing date — if the review succeeds, the trademark right counts from the original filing date, preventing others from jumping the queue with squatting filings;
- The cited trademark's rights status is unstable, and the obstacle may disappear on its own with time.
When to Choose Refiling
- The trademark has not yet been launched or the investment is small, so rebranding costs less than a review (official fee + agency fee + a cycle of over a year);
- The refusal grounds leave essentially no room for argument (e.g., a violation of the Article 10 prohibited signs);
- The refusal grounds can be circumvented by slightly adjusting the trademark elements or deleting goods items;
- The business cannot wait out the review cycle of more than a year.
Dual-Track in Parallel: The Safest Play
The most common strategy in practice is: file a review of the original trademark while simultaneously submitting an adjusted new application. The benefits:
- If the review succeeds, the original trademark and original filing date are preserved;
- If the review fails, the new application may already have been published or even registered, so brand protection never lapses;
- The new application can be optimized against the refusal grounds (adding distinctive elements, avoiding the cited goods), giving it a high pass rate.
Note: the new application must not copy the original trademark verbatim, or it will most likely be refused again on the same grounds.
Decision Checklist
| Dimension | Favors Review | Favors Refiling |
|---|---|---|
| Investment in use of the mark | Large | Small |
| Arguability of refusal grounds | Strong | Weak |
| Time sensitivity | Low | High |
| Value of the original filing date | High | Low |
When in doubt, first obtain a registrability and review success-rate assessment before deciding.
If you are unsure about the issues above, you may first obtain a trademark registration assessment on MyTMBee and act after receiving an analysis from a registered trademark agent.