Trademark Wiki / 审查与驳回

After a Refusal, Which Is Better: Refiling or a Refusal Review?

Q&APublished 2026-09-17 · Updated 2026-09-17

A review preserves the original filing date and offers greater room for argument, suiting trademarks already in use; refiling costs less and is faster, suiting marks with little sunk investment.

Neither a review nor refiling is absolutely superior; the core criteria are: the extent of investment in using the trademark, the arguability of the refusal grounds, and your tolerance for time cost. The two can also run in parallel on a dual track.

When to Choose a Review

  • The trademark is already in use — packaging, promotion, and channels are all rolled out — and rebranding would be costly;
  • The refusal grounds have substantive room for argument (e.g., moderate similarity, a cited trademark vulnerable to non-use cancellation, or use evidence supporting distinctiveness);
  • You want to preserve the original filing date — if the review succeeds, the trademark right counts from the original filing date, preventing others from jumping the queue with squatting filings;
  • The cited trademark's rights status is unstable, and the obstacle may disappear on its own with time.

When to Choose Refiling

  • The trademark has not yet been launched or the investment is small, so rebranding costs less than a review (official fee + agency fee + a cycle of over a year);
  • The refusal grounds leave essentially no room for argument (e.g., a violation of the Article 10 prohibited signs);
  • The refusal grounds can be circumvented by slightly adjusting the trademark elements or deleting goods items;
  • The business cannot wait out the review cycle of more than a year.

Dual-Track in Parallel: The Safest Play

The most common strategy in practice is: file a review of the original trademark while simultaneously submitting an adjusted new application. The benefits:

  1. If the review succeeds, the original trademark and original filing date are preserved;
  2. If the review fails, the new application may already have been published or even registered, so brand protection never lapses;
  3. The new application can be optimized against the refusal grounds (adding distinctive elements, avoiding the cited goods), giving it a high pass rate.

Note: the new application must not copy the original trademark verbatim, or it will most likely be refused again on the same grounds.

Decision Checklist

Dimension Favors Review Favors Refiling
Investment in use of the mark Large Small
Arguability of refusal grounds Strong Weak
Time sensitivity Low High
Value of the original filing date High Low

When in doubt, first obtain a registrability and review success-rate assessment before deciding.

If you are unsure about the issues above, you may first obtain a trademark registration assessment on MyTMBee and act after receiving an analysis from a registered trademark agent.